tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post4932132250388848454..comments2023-02-28T10:44:57.832-05:00Comments on No Socialism: Nasa Backtracks on 1998 Warmest Year ClaimNoSocialism.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02684647225224996398noreply@blogger.comBlogger22125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-1478695849781896162011-02-23T07:32:23.313-05:002011-02-23T07:32:23.313-05:00Again, U.S. has Freedom of Information Act, I seri...Again, U.S. has Freedom of Information Act, I seriously doubt that the rest of the world's governments are telling their populace the truth, there's just way too many taxes on the line for this.NoSocialism.comhttp://www.nosocialism.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-52733452777627598382010-06-03T03:57:34.319-04:002010-06-03T03:57:34.319-04:00Thank you for sharing this very useful information...Thank you for sharing this very useful information.Stomach Bacteriahttp://stomachbacteria.net/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-46053051296658792712008-07-14T12:08:00.000-04:002008-07-14T12:08:00.000-04:00"After the Democrats took office and blocked 31 bi..."After the Democrats took office and blocked 31 bills the Republicans put forward to increase dilling, Coal to Oil, Shale to Oil and Nuclear AND proceeded to pass another 18 bills or so that took another 1 Million Acres near the Rockies away from development, and put up new road blocks on Shale to Oil, Coal to Oil, Offshore Drilling and ANWR. What was the result???<BR/><BR/>Record Profits in the computererdshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02682052671523592579noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-48257197129469398002008-07-11T08:22:00.000-04:002008-07-11T08:22:00.000-04:00Morgan, you started off your statement with "Let's...Morgan, you started off your statement with "Let's start off with your source.... a Right Wing blasablah"<BR/><BR/>My source was a NASA Press release:<BR/>http://prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/08-14-2007/0004645546&EDATE=<BR/>That was the very first link I provided on this story.NoSocialism.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02684647225224996398noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-34147105332894789362008-07-11T07:49:00.000-04:002008-07-11T07:49:00.000-04:00Mike, you said you would like to see data that sho...Mike, you said you would like to see data that shows CO2 has nothing to do with warming OK....<BR/>http://www.oism.org/pproject/Slides/img1.html<BR/>http://www.co2science.org/<BR/>Also, take a look at the video at the bottom of this story and on this next story as well:<BR/>http://www.nosocialism.com/2008/04/world-bank-accused-of-climate-change.html<BR/>And here's some more stories:<BR/>http://NoSocialism.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02684647225224996398noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-7708605184626646442008-07-09T21:29:00.000-04:002008-07-09T21:29:00.000-04:00"I would love to see data that the levels of CO2 i...<I>"I would love to see data that the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere had "nothing to do with warming in the past", because every statistical study I have ever seen based on science shows a strong correlation between CO2 and temperature. CO2 goes up, so does temp."</I><BR/><BR/>Yes... there is a correlation between average atmospheric temperature and average CO2 levels, but it's the opposite of Kykiriahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08648387171905345943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-80283712237622490682008-07-09T16:02:00.000-04:002008-07-09T16:02:00.000-04:00I meant since the end of the Little Ice age, which...I meant since the end of the Little Ice age, which was around the end of the 1600's to the beginning of the 1700's.<BR/><BR/>Also, why BIG OIL give a dammed about Global Warming, it makes their product scarce, and the more scarce it is, the more profits they make from it, since they can charge MORE.<BR/><BR/>Before the Democrats took over Congress Gas was at just over 2 bucks a gallon, adjusted NoSocialism.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02684647225224996398noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-60621816783069373042008-07-09T15:19:00.000-04:002008-07-09T15:19:00.000-04:00What is your point? You said that "The whole point...What is your point? You said that "The whole point of this story that we have a story of Global Warming that is based on supposed facts that no longer exist" but it seems that you are trying to make a point about global warming and its links (or lack thereof) to industrialization and the bi-products.<BR/><BR/>If you are making this argument, I don't see how it really matters. Global worming is Brandon Southernhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17103917788451060268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-83225463964876385502008-07-09T13:21:00.000-04:002008-07-09T13:21:00.000-04:00You said. . ."The point is, rising CO2 had nothing...You said. . .<BR/><BR/>"The point is, rising CO2 had nothing to do with it in the past, and I don't believe, as do many others, that it has anything to do with it now."<BR/><BR/>I would love to see data that the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere had "nothing to do with warming in the past", because every statistical study I have ever seen based on science shows a strong correlation between CO2 and Michaelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10406746327091619601noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-42390221135657408622008-07-09T13:10:00.000-04:002008-07-09T13:10:00.000-04:00A failure of Epic Proportions. You see, that is w...A failure of Epic Proportions. <BR/><BR/>You see, that is why NASA pays top dollar to engineers and scientists, and refuses to pay political hacks with a computer who think anything attributed against their ideology is false. <BR/><BR/>Lets start with the oil money that went into the propaganda trying to obfuscate the global warming scientific knowledge. Exxon has spent millions of dollars to Michaelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10406746327091619601noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-56859484904087014962008-07-09T12:12:00.000-04:002008-07-09T12:12:00.000-04:00The whole point of the Article is the rigidity of ...The whole point of the Article is the rigidity of the scientific community, beginning with the example I gave at the beginning of the Article. Truth is, when you really think about it, AGW doesn't make any sense. Why? Simple, Global warming has been going on for years. 10000 years ago, how much did the temperature change, to cause the Glaciers that covered North American to melt? Yes, we hadNoSocialism.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02684647225224996398noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-30344096763111256152008-07-09T08:21:00.000-04:002008-07-09T08:21:00.000-04:00you got pwned dude.... epic fail...as if your blan...you got pwned dude.... epic fail...<BR/><BR/>as if your blantant blog title clearly to stir controversy for some sleezy ad money was not enough to tip off your undeniable bias. It's your agenda to confuse the sheeple and continue this pointless charade, this tired argument. ITS GLOBAL CLIMATE change, not AMERICA CLIMATE change. Are you that dense that you think america is protected by some Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07244270089331779755noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-8191022917471988052008-07-09T00:02:00.000-04:002008-07-09T00:02:00.000-04:00The tone of this blog is hilarious. You sound lik...The tone of this blog is hilarious. You sound like a creationist trying his best to beat down evolution.<BR/><BR/>Anyone who believes you can tear up millions of years worth of coal and petroleum and inject it into the atmosphere as a gas without it noticably affecting global temperatures has absolutely no understanding of physics and thermodynamics.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-56786507088782122722008-07-08T23:39:00.000-04:002008-07-08T23:39:00.000-04:001934 is the warmest year on record, but only in th...1934 is the warmest year on record, but only in the continental United States. NASA never tried to hide these findings from anyone, once they were informed of their error they updated their records for continental United States temperatures. The only change was that after 2000 all temperatures had to be lowered by .3 degrees F, making the 1998 temperature different from 1934 by .01 degrees F. Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09215124168826669876noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-1541875544655110312008-07-08T23:27:00.000-04:002008-07-08T23:27:00.000-04:00The titles of the two graphs you are comparing sho...The titles of the two graphs you are comparing show that you are comparing world averages to United States averages. The top ten for the world remains entirely post 1990. The problem is sampling error. the US only accounts for 1.6% of the area of the globe therefore you would expect the values to fluctuate more widely than the global mean. <BR/><BR/>World Top 5 Hottest years<BR/>1 2005<BR/>2 msmithmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10893394270242764849noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-7583964053884704642008-07-08T23:24:00.000-04:002008-07-08T23:24:00.000-04:00From http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2007/"Final...From http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2007/<BR/><BR/>"Finally, we note that a minor data processing error found in the GISS temperature analysis in early 2007 does not affect the present analysis. The data processing flaw was failure to apply NOAA adjustments to United States Historical Climatology Network stations in 2000-2006, as the records for those years were taken from a different data Andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12191453293159605086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-52849968665430067792008-07-08T23:21:00.000-04:002008-07-08T23:21:00.000-04:00Not really surprising that all the comments are at...Not really surprising that all the comments are attacks...Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03579689149622550466noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-74815429494011361022008-07-08T23:12:00.000-04:002008-07-08T23:12:00.000-04:00You are correct, but only just. The error was in t...You are correct, but only just. The error was in the mean temperature in the USA, not globally. The global world temperature records were largely unaffected by the minor revision.<BR/><BR/>Try again.Sharkeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04175556830248883005noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-66155206615961314422008-07-08T23:10:00.000-04:002008-07-08T23:10:00.000-04:00I might be confused, but it looks like your first ...I might be confused, but it looks like your first graph is about world temperature whereas your second graph is about temperatures in the U.S.<BR/><BR/>I don't see how the disparities between the two prove or disprove anything. Temperature is local, climate is global, after all.Jesse Farmerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12325658166389857388noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-73990066157118718192008-07-08T23:02:00.000-04:002008-07-08T23:02:00.000-04:00LOL, NASA Backtracking? Are we sure McBush isnt in...LOL, NASA Backtracking? Are we sure McBush isnt in the room? LOL<BR/><BR/>www.FireMe.To/udidoswheelerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09729725828319755126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-50583104702341952272008-07-07T22:06:00.000-04:002008-07-07T22:06:00.000-04:00Oh yeah, one more thing: http://www.truthout.org/a...Oh yeah, one more thing: http://www.truthout.org/article/scientists-were-censored-nasaAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11132164226147263771noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1002364111483784592.post-74174667498490553032008-07-07T22:03:00.000-04:002008-07-07T22:03:00.000-04:00First, lets start with your first source for your ...First, lets start with your first source for your title claim: National Center for Policy Analysis, A right wing conservative group created, headed and run out of Dallas TX of by and for the Oil Industry. Those officers and contributors that aren't blatantly listed as oil companies, such as Crow Holdings, are easy to track down. Harlan Crow, dedicated contributor to KPAC, contributor to Dole, Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11132164226147263771noreply@blogger.com