Another Innocent Child ATTACKED by a "Monster" Who Should've Been Deported

  **Sanctuary Policies Let Him Strike Again**

By Juan Fermin | Nosocialism.com February 14, 2026

Another day, another horror story the mainstream media will bury faster than you can say "comprehensive immigration reform." On January 12, 2025, in Bulloch County, Georgia, an 11-year-old girl was graped in her own home. Her 10-year-old sister was held at knifepoint, forced to watch as a monster tore through their lives. The perpetrator? Kenneth Moreno Guzman – a criminal illegal alien from Mexico who first snuck into our country in 2016, got caught and removed, then waltzed right back in like our borders are a suggestion.

Charges? Grape, statutory grape, aggravated child SA, aggravated sodomy, cruelty to children, home invasion, false imprisonment, burglary, aggravated assault with a knife. This wasn't a "first-time offender" or some poor soul "seeking a better life." This was a predator with a prior arrest in 2023 for driving without a license – the kind of minor rap sheet that should've triggered ICE action long ago if politicians hadn't handcuffed enforcement.

DHS lodged an arrest detainer, thank God, but let's be real: this monster should have never been here to commit the grape in the first place. Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin nailed it: “This monster should have never been in our country in the first place.” These are the victims President Trump and Secretary Noem are fighting for – the ones ignored by sanctuary politicians and the media who scream "racism" every time ICE does its job.

I've said it before, and I'll scream it again: open borders aren't compassion; they're an invitation to chaos. When you erase the line between legal immigrants who play by the rules and criminal aliens who prey on our children, you hand matches to arsonists and then act shocked when the house burns down. From 2011-2016 alone, criminal aliens racked up over 200,000 violent crimes – homicides, assaults, SA offenses. How many more little girls have to be shattered before we stop pretending this is about "humanity"?

I wrote a song about this exact nightmare – "We Fracture When The House is Burning Down" – because words fail when the outrage is this deep. Listen here: [We Fracture When The House is Burning Down]. Lines like "We are busy choosing colors while the smallest sleep without a guard" hit hard because that's the reality: we're distracted by politics while predators find doorways to our children's bedrooms.

This isn't about race or xenophobia – it's about sovereignty, safety, and putting Americans first. The socialist playbook thrives on division, open borders, and eroded law enforcement. They call strict enforcement "cruel" while real cruelty plays out in homes across Georgia, Texas, California, and beyond – grapes and SA ignored in the name of "inclusion."

Demand better. Support ICE. Deport criminal aliens before they strike. Protect our kids – because if we don't, who will?

If you're a victim or know one, contact the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) Office at 1-855-488-6423.

No more excuses. No more fractures. Secure the border. End the madness.

In Just 5 Years, 200,000 Violent Crimes Committed by Criminal Aliens

 By Juan Fermin | Nosocialism.com

Why the Distinction Isn't Just Academic—It's Essential for Safety and Sovereignty

A lot of people out there are talking about immigration and the "Gestapo" tactics of ICE, but let's face it: regardless of the percentage of people with criminal records, the truth is that they don't belong here if they've broken the law to enter or stay. When someone breaks into your house, you don't debate whether they're "good people." You show them the door, and if they refuse, you call the police. ICE is the police in this scenario—enforcing federal law, not whims.

People invoke "What would Jesus say?" as a shield, but we don't know everyone's story, and the system exists for a reason: to verify backgrounds and prevent harm. We do know the tragic toll—thousands of Americans raped, killed, or victimized by individuals who entered illegally. Are their names not important? Don't their families deserve protection? From 2011 to 2016 alone, criminal aliens (non-citizens convicted of crimes) accounted for over 200,000 homicides, assaults, and sex offenses in the U.S. The system isn't a suggestion; it's the thin line between order and anarchy.

To me, the craziest part is how activists throw themselves in front of ICE officers, as if deportation orders are optional. It's not compassion—it's obstruction of justice. And if we adopt their stance, refusing to deport, we're flashing a green light to every thief, murderer, rapist, drug dealer, and thug: "Come on in; we won't enforce the law." As for Jesus, I wonder what He thought when the crowd cheered for Barabbas over justice?

A Call to Restore the Line

America's generosity through legal immigration has made us a beacon—welcoming over 1 million newcomers yearly on merit. But blurring the line with illegal entries invites the very chaos socialism thrives on: open borders, eroded sovereignty, and divided communities. It's time to honor the difference—streamline legal paths for the worthy, and enforce the law without apology for the rest. Because a nation without borders isn't a nation at all.

The Fundamental Difference Between Legal and Illegal Immigration: Why the Line Matters

In the heated debates swirling around immigration, one core truth often gets lost amid the rhetoric: there's a world of difference between legal and illegal immigration. It's not just semantics—it's the foundation of a sovereign nation's right to control its borders, enforce its laws, and protect its citizens. Legal immigration builds up a country through orderly processes that respect the rule of law. Illegal immigration, by contrast, undermines it, creating chaos, straining resources, and inviting exploitation. As we dive into these distinctions, let's cut through the noise with facts and clarity, because ignoring this divide doesn't make borders disappear—it erodes them.

The Legal Path: A Structured Gateway to Opportunity

Legal immigration to the United States isn't a free-for-all; it's a deliberate system designed to welcome those who contribute while safeguarding national interests. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, overseen by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), aspiring immigrants must navigate a rigorous process to gain entry and status.

Here's how it works in practice:

• Visas as the Starting Point: All legal entrants begin with a visa issued by the Department of State. Non-immigrant visas cover temporary stays—like tourism (B-1/B-2), study (F-1), or work (H-1B for skilled professionals). Immigrant visas pave the way for permanent residency, often through family sponsorship (e.g., marrying a U.S. citizen) or employment (e.g., job offers from U.S. companies).
• Green Cards and Permanent Residency: Once approved, immigrants receive a green card, granting lawful permanent resident (LPR) status. In fiscal year 2024, USCIS issued about 1 million green cards, with roughly 65% tied to family reunification and 20% to employment-based preferences. This status allows holders to live and work indefinitely, access certain social services, and even sponsor family members.
• Path to Citizenship: After five years as an LPR (or three if married to a U.S. citizen), eligible individuals can naturalize. This requires passing a civics test, demonstrating English proficiency (with exceptions), and proving "good moral character." Naturalized citizens gain full rights: voting, passports, and federal benefits like Social Security.

As of mid-2025, the U.S. foreign-born population stood at about 52 million—15.5% of the total—with over 77% holding legal status as naturalized citizens, green-card holders, refugees, or long-term visa holders. Legal immigrants fuel innovation and growth: think of the H-1B workers powering Silicon Valley or family-sponsored arrivals strengthening communities. This system isn't perfect—backlogs can stretch years—but it rewards patience, skills, and adherence to the rules.

The Illegal Reality: Breaking In Without Invitation

Illegal, or unauthorized, immigration flips this on its head. It's not a "path" at all; it's a violation. The vast majority enter without inspection (crossing borders undetected) or overstay valid visas, rendering their presence unlawful from day one.

Key hallmarks:

• No Formal Process or Status: Unlike legal entrants, there's no visa, no vetting, no green card. Unauthorized immigrants—estimated at 13.5 million in 2025, comprising about 26% of the foreign-born population—live in the shadows, ineligible for most federal benefits, voting, or citizenship pathways. They can't legally work in many sectors without risking exploitation, and employers hiring them face penalties.
• Limited Rights and Constant Risk: No access to federally funded programs like Social Security or Medicare. Deportation looms large—U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) removed over 271,000 individuals in FY 2024 alone, prioritizing those with criminal convictions. Even without crimes, discovery means detention and removal.
• Scale and Impact: While legal channels admitted around 2.5 million authorized immigrants in 2024, unauthorized entries at the southern border have plummeted in recent months, with U.S. Customs and Border Protection recording historic lows in encounters for FY 2025—down over 80% from peaks in prior years. This isn't abstract: even with the decline, past surges burdened cities with uncompensated costs for education, healthcare, and housing, while diluting wages for low-skilled American workers.

The data paints a stark picture—legal immigration is controlled and contributory; illegal is disruptive and unsustainable.

Follow us on X @NoSocialism, YouTube @NosocialismDotCom, Facebook facebook.com/nosocialismcom, TikTok @nosocialism8, Instagram @NoSocialism, or Threads @nosocialism for more unfiltered truth against the socialist tide.

Obama Administration Set to Deport Christian Family Fleeing Persecution

In 2010 a U.S. Immigration Judge granted the Romeike family political asylum, based upon the fact that the German Government was attempting to remove their kids from them.  What was their hideous crime that would cause the German Government to take the draconian measures of removing the Romeike Children from their home?  Why they were Home Schooling their children, and even worse teaching them Christian Values.  These are things that are currently illegal in Germany and will no longer be tolerated.

Fast forward to 2013, and if you listen to the Obama Administration while making the following proclamation on Religious Freedom Day, you would think they would be on the Romeike families side right?:

“Today, we also remember that religious liberty is not just an American right; it is a universal human right to be protected here at home and across the globe. This freedom is an essential part of human dignity, and without it our world cannot know lasting peace.”

“As we observe Religious Freedom Day, let us remember the legacy of faith and independence we have inherited, and let us honor it by forever upholding our right to exercise our beliefs free from prejudice or persecution…”

Yet at the same time U.S. Attorney, Eric Holder is moving to have them deported!  The Administration claims that the families fundamental rights have not been violated by the German Government's law forbidding families from homeschooling, so they've asked the courts to withdraw the families political asylum and have them deported back to Germany!

The Home School legal Defense Association (HSLDA) is representing the Romeikes family and are doing what they can to have them stay in the US.  The HSLDA issued the following statement:

“The U.S. law of asylum allows a refugee to stay in the United States permanently if he can show that he is being persecuted for one of several specific reasons. Among these are persecution for religious reasons and persecution of a ‘particular social group.’”

“In most asylum cases, there is some guesswork necessary to figure out the government’s true motive—but not in this case. The Supreme Court of Germany declared that the purpose of the German ban on homeschooling was to ‘counteract the development of religious and philosophically motivated parallel societies.’”

“This sounds elegant, perhaps, but at its core it is a frightening concept. This means that the German government wants to prohibit people who think differently from the government (on religious or philosophical grounds) from growing and developing into a force in society.”

“The Romeikes’ case is before the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The case for the government is officially in the name of the Attorney General of the United States. The case is called Romeike v. Holder. Thus, the brief filed by the U.S. Department of Justice is filed on behalf of the attorney general himself—although we can be reasonably certain he has not personally read it. Nonetheless, it is a statement of the position of our government at a very high level.”

“We argued that Germany is a party to many human rights treaties that contain specific provisions that protect the right of parents to provide an education that is different from the government schools. Parents have the explicit right to give their children an education according to their own philosophy.”

“While the United States government argued many things in their brief, there are three specific arguments that you should know about.”

“First, they argued that there was no violation of anyone’s protected rights in a law that entirely bans homeschooling. There would only be a problem if Germany banned homeschooling for some but permitted it for others.”

“A second argument is revealing. The U.S. government contended that the Romeikes’ case failed to show that there was any discrimination based on religion because, among other reasons, the Romeikes did not prove that all homeschoolers were religious, and that not all Christians believed they had to homeschool.”

“This argument demonstrates another form of dangerous “group think” by our own government. The central problem here is that the U.S. government does not understand that religious freedom is an individual right. One need not be a part of any church or other religious group to be able to make a religious freedom claim. Specifically, one doesn’t have to follow the dictates of a church to claim religious freedom—one should be able to follow the dictates of God Himself.”

“One final argument from Romeikes deserves our attention. One of the grounds for asylum is if persecution is aimed at a “particular social group.” The definition of a “particular social group” requires a showing of an “immutable” characteristic that cannot change or should not be required to be changed. We contend that German homeschoolers are a particular social group who are being persecuted by their government.”

If returned to Germany, the Romeike family will be torn apart by the German Government, facing fines, Jail time and the removal of the children.